Out of hospital cardiac arrest during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study from north east of Italy

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak affected the epidemiology and the outcomes of Out- Of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). We performed a retrospective observational study in the Western district of Vicenza (Veneto, Italy) to evaluate patients affected by non-traumatic OHCA and we analyzed epidemiological and clinical characteristics associated with sustained Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC). We collected 114 cases from January 2019 to May 2021 and we compared data of the pre-pandemic period (2019) with the pandemic one (2020-2021). During the pandemic we found an increase of bystander CPR, of OHCA with a cardiac cause and of shockable presenting rhythms. All these observations weren't associated with an increase of sustained ROSC, which could be determined by both the reorganization of the health care system with the reduction of medical screenings and by the interruption of training courses reducing the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the other hand, the higher percentage of presenting shockable rhythm reinforces the importance of bystander rule and of short time to start CPR.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of community-based mental health care in North-East of Italy: A psychiatric case register study.

AIMS: WHO declared that mental health care should be considered one essential health service to be maintained during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aims to describe the effect of lockdown and restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy on mental health services' utilisation, by considering psychiatric diagnoses and type of mental health contacts. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Verona catchment area, located in the Veneto region (northeastern Italy). For each patient, mental health contacts were grouped into: (1) outpatient care, (2) social and supportive interventions, (3) rehabilitation interventions, (4) multi-professional assessments, (5) day care. A 'difference in differences' approach was used: difference in the number of contacts between 2019 and 2020 on the weeks of lockdown and intermediate restrictions was compared with the same difference in weeks of no or reduced restrictions, and such difference was interpreted as the effect of restrictions. Both a global regression on all contacts and separate regressions for each type of service were performed and Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs) were calculated. RESULTS: In 2020, a significant reduction in the number of patients who had mental health contacts was found, both overall and for most of the patients' characteristics considered (except for people aged 18-24 years for foreign-born population and for those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Moreover, in 2020 mental health contacts had a reduction of 57 096 (-33.9%) with respect to 2019; such difference remained significant across the various type of contacts considered, with rehabilitation interventions and day care showing the greatest reduction. Negative Binomial regressions displayed a statistically significant effect of lockdown, but not of intermediate restrictions, in terms of reduction in the number of contacts. The lockdown period was responsible of a 32.7% reduction (IRR 0.673; p-value <0.001) in the overall number of contacts. All type of mental health contacts showed a reduction ascribable to the lockdown, except social and supportive interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the access to community mental health care during the pandemic was overall reduced, the mental health system in the Verona catchment area was able to maintain support for more vulnerable and severely ill patients, by providing continuity of care and day-by-day support through social and supportive interventions.

Telemedicine as technoinnovation to tackle COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis

Telemedicine has become fundamental for the challenges posed to healthcare. This set of instruments turns pivotal for facing one of the most relevant emergencies in human history: the COVID-19 pandemic. The multisectoral crisis led to a vigorously sustained adoption of innovations, including telemedicine technology. Telehealth was proven, in this context, to be a relevant tool to reduce healthcare costs, reduce not-needed hospitalizations, and improve the results in health care. Some barriers such as the costs of technologies, patient privacy and technical literacy have slowed down telemedicine adoption. Amidst the COVID-19 era, telemedicine calls for a managerial duty to change healthcare's organizational models. The present work aims to explore the growing literature to illuminate the relationships between telemedicine, innovations and healthcare in the COVID-19 framework. A bibliometric analysis of the existing literature based on 285 published works in 2019–2020 is put forward with the aim to detect the relevant literature, themes and approaches on telemedicine and COVID-19. Making use of community detection on the co-occurrence keywords network, we identify the "semantic cores” in the literature representing the relevant results on critical themes. The sorting implications are important for researchers and policymakers by mapping the existing literature and results in evidence-based analysis. We provide the key communities as the "semantic core” of the publications and results for the considered period. This allows for future research to be oriented towards perduring health policies that could lead to the adoption of telemedicine technologies in a post-pandemic scenario. © 2021

Second versus first wave of covid-19 in patients with mpn

Introduction. MPN-COVID is a European LeukemiaNet cohort study, launched in March 2020 in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) with COVID-19. The first cohort of 175 cases was analyzed at the end of first wave (July 2020) and results provided estimates and risk factors of overall mortality (Barbui T. Leukemia, 2021), thrombosis incidence (Barbui T. Blood Cancer J, 2021), and post-COVID outcomes (Barbui T. Blood Cancer J, 2021). In the second wave of pandemic (June 2020 to June 2021), case-fatality risk in the general population has been found variable across different countries, and no information is available in MPN patients with COVID-19 diagnosed during the second wave in comparison with those of the first wave. Methods. In an electronic case report form, we registered a total of 479 cases of ET (n=161, 34%), PV (n=135, 28%), pre-PMF (n=49, 10%) and overt MF (n=134, 28%), from 39 European hematology units (Italy, Spain, Germany, France, UK, Poland, Croatia). Of these, 304 were diagnosed COVID-19 during the second wave. Results. Patients in the second wave were significantly different from those in the first wave, including parameters such as age (median: 63 vs. 71 years, p<.001), sex (females: 52% vs. 42%, p=0.037), MPN category (MF 24% vs. 34%, p=0.020), comorbidity (at least one comorbidity 63% vs. 74%, p=0.012), disposition (home: 68% vs. 23%, regular ward: 29% vs. 66%, ICU: 3% vs. 11%, p<.001), need of respiratory support (28% vs. 59%, p<.001) and degree of systemic inflammation (C-Reactive Protein: 51% vs. 74%, p=0.008;Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio: 4.1 vs. 5.4, p=0.038). In regard to COVID-19-directed therapy, in the second wave steroids were more frequently prescribed (28% vs. 40%, p=0.007), while the use of antibiotics, antivirals, hydroxychloroquine and experimental therapies was significantly less frequent (p<.001 for all the differences). Interestingly, only 4 out of 46 patients (8.7%) discontinued Ruxolitinib during second-wave acute COVID (all MF admitted to regular ward). In the two waves, distribution probability of COVID-19 incidence by Kernel method showed a substantially similar shape, whereas the two incidence peaks were associated with very different mortality, as reported in Fig. 1A. The difference between the probability of death was highly significant during the first (n=175) vs. second (n=304): 31% vs. 9% at 60 days from COVID-19 diagnosis, respectively (p<.001) (Fig. 1B). Of note, among 26 deaths, 4 (15%) occurred at home, 19 (73%) on regular wards and 3 (12%) in the ICU, and death more frequently afflicted patients with (n=17, 65%) than ET (n=5, 19%) and PV (n=4. 15%) (p<.001). Independent risk factors for death in a multivariate Cox regression model fitted on the whole cohort and adjusted for the wave to which patients belonged, were age over 70 years (HR=5.2, 95% CI 1.8-15.1, p=0.002), male sex (HR=1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1, p=0.016), COVID-19 severity revealed by the need for respiratory support (HR=4.5, 95% CI 1.9-10.7, p=0.001), and Ruxolitinib discontinuation (HR=3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.9, p=0.011). Conversely, in patients who continued this drug, no risk was documented (HR=1.21, p=0.566). Taking into account death as competing event, the second outcome of interest was the incidence of thrombosis, wich occurred in a significantly lower proportion of patients in the second wave compared to the first one (n=5 [1.6%] vs. n=14 [8.0%] at +60 days, respectively, SHR=0.20, p=0.002) (Fig. 1C). All the events, but one (n=4/5) were venous and were reported in patients with ET (SHR=4.4, 95% CI 1.8-10.7, p=0.001). Conclusions. This is the largest series of MPN patients who incurred COVID-19 from June 2020 onward, namely during the 'second COVID-19 wave'. Compared to the first wave, the second one recorded a lower overall COVID-19 severity, but Ruxolitinib discontinuation still remained a risk factor for a dismal outcome. Greater vulnerability of ET than PV in developing venous thrombosis was confirmed also during the second wave. This finding suggests that ET warrants a specific antithrombo ic prophylaxis in addition to heparin.

Is COVID 19 introducing a new model of internal medicine ward?

Background Covid 19 has recently been defined as a syndemia, because it combines the epidemic emergency of Sars Cov 2 with that of non-communicable diseases. This aspect is particularly known in internal medicine wards (IM), which have had to split up to support these new criticalities. Methods Delphi method has been used to make the Ishikawa's diagram to analyze the reasons of the death in COVID ward. Each item was attributed a score according to a pros/cons and opportunities/threats system, derived from evidence in the literature. Scores were presented in a Cartesian graph showing the positioning according to the potential value and the perceived risk associated with the items. In the end, the performances of MC (Covid ward, split in I wave, II wave and overall) and MCF (internal medicine Covid-free ward) have been compared through the Barber's nomogram. Results MCF hospitalized 790 patients (-23,90% compared to 2019), Overall-MC patients: 50% of the 2019 MCF. Main cause of mortality-risk: patients originating from local facilities (+7%) and comorbidities (58% Chronic renal failure, 41% cancer, 90% age, 70% COVID 19 WHO stage 3. >3 comorbidities: 100%, ≥5: 24,7%). Length of stay: 8-60 days (mean value, MV: 17) for MC, 2-12 (MV 8) for MCF. Turnover Index: 10 day for MC II, 8 MC I, 1 for MCF. 25% of patients in MC have been treated with Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV), with high cost hospitalization-related. Conclusions Internal-Medicine ward model is a ward strictly tied to the community both before and after hospitalization. COVID 19 proposes a new model of IM, nearly subintensive ward, with NIV and continuous monitoring of vital signs, long length of stay and low turnover index. Is this the internal medicine ward for the future? Key messages COVID 19 proposes a new model of Internal Medicine ward, nearly subintensive ward, with Non Invasive Ventilation and continuous monitoring of vital signs, long length of stay and low turnover index. Covid 19 mortality is strictly connected with the origin from territorial health-assisted residences.

SARS-COVID19 infection at various stages of kidney disease: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several chronic medical conditions appear to increase the risk of severe COVID-19. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have a high risk of symptomatic infection and severe respiratory symptoms because of chronic inflammation, uremic toxins accumulation, endothelial dysfunction and an impaired immune response. Even though the presence of one or more comorbidities increases the risk of mortality, information of the outcome of COVID-19 in CKD patients is not yet available. The aim of the study is to present the incidence and outcome of COVID- 19 in patients referring to our Nephrology Unit considering CKD patients, dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients. METHOD: This study is prospective single centre carried out considering patients referring to the Nephrology Unit of St. Orsola University Hospital in Bologna with COVID 19 diagnosis from 15THMarch to 30THMay 2020. RESULTS: Our cohort included 52 patients admitted to our Nephrology Unit because of Sars Cov2 infection confirmed by positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab. The mean age was 67.2 6 13.8 years (range, 33-88 years). Demographic, clinical and radiological features in Table 1. Forty-eight patients (92.3%) underwent chest TC. The main findings were: several bilateral interstitial pneumonia (39 patients, 81.2%), monolateral peripheral ground-glass opacities (6 patients, 12.5%), no signs of pneumonia (3 patients, 6.2 %). Clinical course is highly variable: 18 patients (34.6 %) were asymptomatic, 23 patients (44 %) had a mild course requiring low flux oxygen therapy and 11 patients (21%) presented severe pneumonia and respiratory distress that requires ventilatory support in intensive care unit. Forty patients (70%) had hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin dual therapy, 3 patients (6%) had antiviral therapy in addiction. Sixteen patients (31%) with P/F <150 mmHg were treated with Tocilizumab. Heparin Therapy, to prevent the thromboembolic risk of Sars-Cov2 infection, was administered according to the body weight in forty patients (70%);, but not in patients in warfarin therapy (12 patients, 30%). Twenty-six patients (50%) needed antibiotics for bacterial infections combined to the Sars-Cov2 infection. Steroid therapy was added in 40% of cases. The average time of negativization for Sars Cov2, tested with two nasopharyngeal swab specimens made seven days apart, was 31615 day. Fifty-one patients, 98% of diagnosed cases, required hospitalization with an average stay of 35±26 days. Thirty patients (25%) died. Mean age of non-survivors was 72±11years while mean age of survivors was 64±11years. No differences in preexisting comorbidities were observed between survivors and non survivors;oxygen saturation on presentation was statistically lower in non survivors. CONCLUSION: CKD is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 associated inhospital mortality. The mortality rate (25%), much higher than in general population (1.8-8%) may be explained by the older age of patients and the presence of more pathological conditions, especially cardiovascular disease.

Long-term follow-up of recovered mpn patients with covid-19

To our knowledge, there is no information on long-term follow-up of recovered patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) with COVID-19. It can be hypothesized that cytokine storm of the acute phase and the post-COVID persistence of a residual inflammatory state may contribute to elicit hematopoietic stem cell insults and continuous vascular endothelial damage, leading to MPN disease progression and persistent high risk of thrombosis. Aims: To describe sequelae of COVID-19 in surviving patients with MPN following COVID-19. Methods: MPN-COVID study involved 38 European blood centers, and accrued 180 patients with MPN diagnosed with COVID-19 from Feb to Jun 2020, assessing mortality and incidence of thrombosis and bleeding during the acute phase of the pandemic [Barbui T et al. Leukemia. 2021;35(2):485-493. Barbui T et al. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(2):21]. One-hundred-twenty-five (69%) of these patients survived and were followed up for at least 6 months. Centers were asked to update symptoms, treatments, hematological changes, major outcomes (i.e., thrombosis, disease evolution and death). Results: Among the 125 surviving patients, all eligible for the follow-up update, with a median age 70 years (IQR: 58-79), the following phenotypes were registered: PV (n=38, 30%), ET (n=37, 30%), early PMF (n=14, 11%) and MF (n=36, 29%). During the acute phase of infection, 38 (30%) were managed at home, 80 (64%) in a regular ward and 7 (6%) in ICU. Symptoms (i)The 3 prevalent symptoms during the acute phase of the disease were fever (79%), cough (56%) and dyspnea (53%), while gastrointestinal, neurological, musculoskeletal symptoms, as well as fatigue and anosmia/ dysgeusia, were present in a minor proportion, ranging from 1.6% to 17%. (ii) In the post-acute COVID-19 phase, 36 of 125 patients (32%) declared the persistence of some of these symptoms, fatigue being the most frequent (19%), while none presented persistence of fever and only 10% of dyspnea. Major outcomes (i) Major thrombosis was documented in 5 patients and involved 3 patients with MF (one fatal intestinal ischemia, two non-fatal events: splenic infarction and peripheral artery thrombosis), one case in PV (acute myocardial infarction) and one with ET (DVT of the legs with pulmonary embolism). Age varied from 61 to 80 years. The first event occurred five months after COVID-19 recovery and the Kaplan Meier thrombosis-free survival probability after 9 months was 82%. (ii) Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) was ascertained in 3 patients (1 in MF, 1 in early-PMF, 1 in ET);one was fatal and occurred in a 49-yearold patient, the other 2 in 78- and 82-year-old patients, respectively. One non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma (in ET) and one progression of a previous parotid carcinoma (in MF) were seen in two patients aged 60 and 77 years, respectively. (iii) Deaths were reported in 8 patients (6.4%), due to AML (n=1), thrombosis (n=1), progression to prior carcinoma (n=2, 1 suspected), multi organ failure (n=1) and heart failure (n=2);the cause was unknown in a single patient. Five deaths (63%) occurred in MF patients. (iv) Overall, the event-free survival pooling together thrombosis, disease evolution and death reached 66% after 9 months from COVID- 19 recovery, indicating that, during this time of observation, 1 out of 3 patients died or have experienced at least one of the other two severe events. Summary/Conclusion: These results indicate that MPN patients who have survived SARS-CoV-2 infection continue to experience severe events suggesting an increased vigilance in the post-COVID period.

Spread of COVID-19, meteorological conditions and air quality in the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina: two facets observed during its pandemic lockdown

This work studied the spread of COVID-19, the meteorological conditions and the air quality in a megacity from two viewpoints: (1) the correlation between meteorological and air quality (PM₁₀ and NO₂) variables with infections and deaths due COVID-19, and (2) the improvement in air quality. Both analyses were performed for the pandemic lockdown due to COVID-19 in the City of Buenos Aires (CABA), the capital and the largest city in Argentina. Daily data from temperature, rainfall, average relative humidity, wind speed, PM₁₀, NO₂, new cases and deaths due COVID-19 were analyzed. Our findings showed a significant correlation of meteorological and air quality variables with COVID-19 cases. The highest temperature correlation occurred before the confirmation day of new cases. PM₁₀ presented the highest correlation within 13 to 15 days lag, while NO₂ within 3 to 6 days lag. Also, reductions in PM₁₀ and NO₂ were observed. This study shows that exposure to air pollution was significantly correlated with an increased risk of becoming infected and dying due to COVID-19. Thus, these results show that the NO₂ and PM₁₀ levels in CABA can serve as one of the indicators to assess vulnerability to COVID-19. In addition, decision-makers can use this information to adopt strategies to restrict human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic and future outbreaks of similar diseases in CABA.

Dalla Kawasaki Disease alla MIS-C: L’esperienza di Bergamo

Kawasaki disease (KD), although rare (affects about 15 children out of 100,000/year) and self-limiting, it is the second most frequent cause of pediatric acquired heart disease in Western countries. The classic KD is diagnosed by fever and at least 4 clinical signs between conjunctivitis, mucositis, polymorphic rash, erythema and edema of hands and feet or lymphadenopathy;if clinical signs are less than 4 the incomplete KD can be diagnosed together with specific laboratory criteria. Since March 2020, at the time of the greatest spread of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in our province, we found over 20 children, admitted to the Pediatrics of our hospital, with clinical pictures very similar to Kawasaki disease. In addition to signs of mucocutaneous inflammation, some children had a significant systemic inflammation with severe heart involvement, up to shock in some cases. In the next months, similar cases were reported in areas of the world with a high spread of the virus, and the scientific community coined the name of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) for this form linked to SARS-CoV-2. KD conventional therapy based on intravenous immunoglobulin, acetylsalicylic acid and systemic steroids resolved the inflammation in all children. This article critically discusses the common characteristics of the two diseases and hypothesizes that they belong to the same pathological condition with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations;it proposes the diagnostic framework for this new inflammatory condition based on clinical and laboratory characteristics and, finally, outlines the principles of treatment. © 2021, Associazione Culturale Pediatri. All rights reserved.

Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a highly burdened area of north-east Italy.

AIMS: Healthcare workers exposed to coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) patients could be psychologically distressed. This study aims to assess the magnitude of psychological distress and associated factors among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large tertiary hospital located in north-east Italy. METHODS: All healthcare and administrative staff working in the Verona University Hospital (Veneto, Italy) during the COVID-19 pandemic were asked to complete a web-based survey from 21 April to 6 May 2020. Symptoms of post-traumatic distress, anxiety and depression were assessed, respectively, using the Impact of Event Scale (IES-R), the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Personal socio-demographic information and job characteristics were also collected, including gender, age, living condition, having pre-existing psychological problems, occupation, length of working experience, hospital unit (ICUs and sub-intensive COVID-19 units vs. non-COVID-19 units). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with each of the three mental health outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2195 healthcare workers (36.9% of the overall hospital staff) participated in the study. Of the participants, 35.7% were nurses, 24.3% other healthcare staff, 16.4% residents, 13.9% physicians and 9.7% administrative staff. Nine per cent of healthcare staff worked in ICUs, 8% in sub-intensive COVID-19 units and 7.6% in other front-line services, while the remaining staff worked in hospital units not directly engaged with COVID-19 patients. Overall, 63.2% of participants reported COVID-related traumatic experiences at work and 53.8% (95% CI 51.0%-56.6%) showed symptoms of post-traumatic distress; moreover, 50.1% (95% CI 47.9%-52.3%) showed symptoms of clinically relevant anxiety and 26.6% (95% CI 24.7%-28.5%) symptoms of at least moderate depression. Multivariable logistic regressions showed that women, nurses, healthcare workers directly engaged with COVID-19 patients and those with pre-existing psychological problems were at increased risk of psychopathological consequences of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare staff working in a highly burdened geographical of north-east Italy is relevant and to some extent greater than that reported in China. The study provides solid grounds to elaborate and implement interventions pertaining to psychology and occupational health.